Pellica — The BlogFrame 010 / 069 · 2026.07.03 · 7 min readFilm stocks

Budget B&W Film Shootout: Kentmere Pan 200 vs Lucky vs Foma

Kentmere Pan 200, Lucky SHD400, and Fomapan 400 all sell for under $10 a roll in 2026. We compare price, grain, contrast, latitude, and development ease across cited tests — and pick the right budget black-and-white film for your first roll.

Kentmere Pan 200 black-and-white film packaging in 120, 35mm, and bulk-roll boxes against a plain white background

Credit · Harman Technology / PetaPixel · Kentmere Pan 200 black-and-white film packaging in 120, 35mm, and bulk-roll boxes against a plain white background

Between May 2025 and mid-2026, the cheapest shelf in film photography quietly became its most competitive. Harman announced Kentmere Pan 200 on May 8, 2025 — the first new Kentmere emulsion in years. China's Lucky brand returned to black-and-white production with SHD400, which reached Western shops over the following year. And Fomapan 400, the Czech veteran that has anchored the budget category for decades, kept doing what it always does: undercutting everyone with a look nobody else makes.

That leaves a genuinely hard question for anyone shooting black and white on a budget in 2026: which of these sub-$10 rolls actually deserves a place in your camera? With color negative prices still climbing — our film prices guide tracks the roughly 9% rise since early 2025 — cheap monochrome is where beginners, students, and high-volume shooters have migrated. The three stocks compared here take very different routes to a low price.

The cheapest roll is not the one with the lowest sticker price. It is the one that gives you usable negatives on the first try.

Kentmere Pan 200: The New Benchmark

Kentmere Pan 200 is the newest of the three and, on the published evidence, the most complete. Harman launched it in 35mm (24 and 36 exposures), 120, and bulk rolls, positioning it between the existing Kentmere 100 and 400 — PetaPixel's announcement coverage quoted Harman describing "enhanced contrast, pleasing, well-controlled grain, and good sharpness."

The reviews backed the marketing up. PetaPixel's full review (May 26, 2025) called it "your new daily driver film" at $8 per 36-exposure roll, noting that frames looked like premium films after a contrast boost in post — except straight off the negative. Digital Camera World's review (October 20, 2025) went further, naming it the new best budget B&W film: deeper blacks and brighter highlights than either sibling, subdued but visible grain, and enough latitude that both overexposed and underexposed frames stayed usable.

Pricing has held steady since launch. According to analog.cafe's price tracker, Kentmere Pan 200 averages $8.13 per 36-exposure 35mm roll in 2026, with 24-exposure rolls around $7.49 and 120 rolls near $7. Its older sibling Kentmere 400 remains the reference budget choice when you genuinely need box-speed 400 — around $7 per 36-exposure roll in the US as of mid-2026, per retailer listings — but reviewers consistently describe its tonality as flatter and its grain as more prominent than the new 200.

Lucky SHD400: The Cheapest Ticket In

Lucky SHD400 competes on one number. In 35mmc's review (August 11, 2025), Yuval Peleg reported buying 10 rolls on AliExpress for $39 — roughly $3.90 per roll, less than half the price of anything Harman or Foma sells. In the US, Brooklyn Film Camera stocks it at $9 per 36-exposure roll as of July 3, 2026, which puts Western retail pricing level with Kentmere rather than below it.

The film itself earns more respect than its price suggests. Peleg found the grain "noticeable but quite pleasing," the sharpness surprising for the cost, and the rendering reminiscent of the 1980s, with crushed blacks and muted tones. Reflx Lab's test of the 120 version (February 2, 2026) described the grain as fine and unobtrusive, on a thin base rolled in recycled Fujicolor backing paper.

Two caveats are consistent across sources. First, exposure: 35mmc, Reflx Lab, and Brooklyn Film Camera all recommend rating SHD400 at EI 200 rather than box speed, because shadows go empty at 400. Second, quality control: Peleg documented random black dots on his negatives — a "dot plague" — and while Reflx Lab's own samples were clean, it acknowledged that other users' reports of emulsion damage "should be taken seriously." Our separate Lucky SHD400 review digs into the stock in detail.

Fomapan 400 Action: The Old-School Veteran

Fomapan 400 is the incumbent. Made by Foma Bohemia in the Czech Republic and sold in the US as the identical Arista EDU Ultra 400, it has been the default cheap monochrome roll for generations of students. Fine Art Pics' review describes a character-driven film — grit, texture, soft glowing highlights — that "won't disappear into the background," at a typical £6–7 per roll in the UK; US listings for Arista EDU Ultra 400 have run under $6 per roll, per Aly's Vintage Camera Alley's late-2024 roundup.

It is also the grainiest of the three by the maker's own numbers. Blue Moon Camera's review notes the datasheet RMS granularity of 17.5 — slightly coarser than Kodak Tri-X at 17 — with a grain pattern that feels decades old in the best sense. Latitude is asymmetric: EMULSIVE's long-term review found it handles overexposure well but gives little back in the shadows, which is why many shooters rate it between EI 200 and 320. If you want clean, modern negatives, this is the wrong film. If you want atmosphere per dollar, it has no rival.

The Numbers, Side by Side

Kentmere Pan 200Kentmere 400Lucky SHD400Fomapan 400
Price per 36-exp roll (mid-2026)$8.13 avg (analog.cafe tracker)~$7 US$9 US retail; ~$3.90 direct from China£6–7 UK; under $6 US as Arista EDU 400
GrainFine-medium, well controlledMore visible, classicPleasing in 35mm, fine in 120Coarsest (RMS 17.5), old-school
ContrastPunchy, deep blacksFlatter, greyHigh, crushed blacks at box speedModerate, glowing highlights
LatitudeWide both directionsForgivingFavors overexposure; shoot EI 200Overexposure only; weak shadows
Home developmentOfficial Ilford times everywhereOfficial Ilford times everywhereSparse data; community recipesMassive Dev Chart staple
Formats and availability35mm, 120, bulk; wide35mm, 120, bulk; wide35mm, 120; specialty shops + AliExpress35mm, 120, sheet; wide (two names)

Read as a whole, the table says something simple: as of July 2026, Lucky SHD400 bought direct from China is the cheapest black-and-white film you can load at roughly $3.90 a roll, but Kentmere Pan 200 at $8.13 is the one reviewers keep calling the best value.

Which Budget B&W for Your First Roll

If this is your first black-and-white roll ever and a lab will develop it, load Kentmere Pan 200. It is the most predictable of the three — wide latitude, contrast that looks finished without editing, and official development times everywhere. Our beginner film stock guide reaches the same conclusion for the same reasons, and if you are unsure whether 200 speed covers your shooting, our film ISO guide explains the trade-off in two minutes.

If you develop at home and want the lowest cost per frame, Lucky SHD400 at EI 200 is the play — the QC lottery matters far less when you can inspect and rewash your own negatives, and at AliExpress prices a blemished frame costs eleven cents. If you are new to souping film, our home development guide covers everything from chemistry to drying.

If you want character more than cleanliness — visible grain, glowing highlights, a rendering that looks forty years old on purpose — Fomapan 400 is the only one of the three with a signature. And if you simply need honest box-speed 400 with no exposure caveats, the old Kentmere 400 is still the safest $7 in film photography.

Frequently asked questions

What is the cheapest black-and-white film in 2026?

Lucky SHD400 bought direct from China, at roughly $3.90 per roll in ten-packs on AliExpress as of mid-2026. In Western shops the gap closes: SHD400 retails around $9 in the US, while Fomapan 400 (sold there as Arista EDU Ultra 400) runs under $6 and Kentmere Pan 200 averages $8.13 per 36-exposure roll per analog.cafe's price tracker.

Should I shoot Lucky SHD400 at ISO 400 or ISO 200?

Rate it at EI 200. 35mmc's August 2025 review, Reflx Lab's February 2026 test of the 120 version, and US retailer Brooklyn Film Camera all found noticeably better shadow detail one stop over box speed.

Which budget black-and-white film is easiest to develop at home?

Kentmere Pan 200 and Fomapan 400, because both have official times published for common developers and deep Massive Dev Chart coverage. Lucky SHD400 has sparse official data, so shooters borrow recipes — 35mmc's reviewer used an HC-110 Tri-X recipe with good results.

Run Your Own Shootout — and Keep the Receipts

Reviews narrow the field, but the only shootout that settles anything is the one you run through your own camera. Three rolls, one subject, one afternoon of light — and notes on every frame, because a week later you will not remember which negatives came from which stock or what you rated them at.

Pellica's film roll tracker logs each roll and frame with exposure settings, film stock, GPS, and notes, so your Kentmere frames never get credited to the Foma roll. The built-in light meter matters more than usual here — two of these three films reward a full stop of overexposure, and guessing defeats the comparison. When the rolls are done, the lab finder shows which labs near you still run true black-and-white chemistry.

Cheap film is the best teacher in photography. At these prices, the tuition is under $25 for all three lessons.

End of frame 010Advance · Frame 009 → Lucky SHD400 Review: The Budget B&W Film…film stocks · guides · black and white